# Cron Job: git基线自动提交-每日3点（可回退保鲜）

**Job ID:** 180f2bf3d6a1
**Run Time:** 2026-11-05 03:01:26
**Mode:** no_agent (script)
**Status:** script failed

Script exited with code 1
stderr:
❌ git_autocommit.sh: 失败 rc=1 (目标脚本返回非零)
stdout:
[git_autocommit 明细] git commit(含pre-commit门禁) 失败 repo=/home/ubuntu/stock_workspace（已存 /home/ubuntu/.hermes/logs/git_autocommit.log）
        +2  基线0→2  ~/stock_workspace/bull_launch_study.py
        +1  基线0→1  ~/stock_workspace/bull_layout_scan.py
        +2  基线0→2  ~/stock_workspace/bull_phase_study.py
        +2  基线0→2  ~/stock_workspace/find_ledger.py
        +10  基线0→10  ~/stock_workspace/five_step_backtest.py
        +1  基线0→1  ~/stock_workspace/funnel_daily.py
        +3  基线0→3  ~/stock_workspace/pool_backtest.py
        +3  基线0→3  ~/stock_workspace/pool_dynamic_manager.py
        +3  基线0→3  ~/stock_workspace/scratch_idx_rt.py
        +10  基线0→10  ~/stock_workspace/scratch_taoge_verify.py
        +1  基线0→1  ~/stock_workspace/wash_scan.py
        修法: C1→hardcode_config.IDX_*/POOL_* | C2/C3→命名常量(值+来源+日期三件套) | C4→Path.home() | C5→参数化(默认值也走配置)

⛔ 提交被拦下。这不是刁难 —— 上面每条都对应一次真实事故（见 skill silent-failure-defense）。
   确认无问题可: git commit --no-verify
[git_autocommit 明细] git commit(含pre-commit门禁) 失败 repo=/home/ubuntu/.hermes/scripts（已存 /home/ubuntu/.hermes/logs/git_autocommit.log）
     - What does `full_market_pool.py` do with a missing/stale `--date` default — does it fall back to the last trading day?
     - Where does `strong_pool_push.sh`'s stdout go (mail, push wrapper, discarded)? Determines whether `echo "$OUT2"` reaching stdout is a feature or a regression.
     
     ## Summary
     The changes follow a sensible "produce → scan, degrade on failure, log loudly" pattern, and the rc-preservation placement in `judgment_backtest_calibrate.sh` is correct as written. The main risks are operational: two jobs concurrently writing the same pool artifacts without a lock, an unconditional `exit 0` that blinds exit-code monitoring, interpreter/`--date` inconsistencies between the two pool-production call sites that can make one path permanently degraded, and unverified assumptions in the fallback paths (pool files exist, venv path resolves). Address findings 1–3 before merging; 4–7 are correctness cleanups; add tests for the degradation contract.
⏱  AI 首审: 未在前台预算 60s 内完成（已等 60s）→ 转后台继续
     → 总预算 600s, 跑完落 /home/ubuntu/.hermes/logs/ai_first_review.log 并在下次调用时补印
     → 这是「后台继续审」, 不是「审过了」; 确定性门禁不受影响
❌ 硬编码新增零容忍（逐文件超基线，C1代码/C2阈值/C3参数/C4路径/C5日期）:
     🔴 硬编码新增零容忍门（逐文件超基线）:
        +10  基线75→85  ~/.hermes/scripts/data_hub.py
        修法: C1→hardcode_config.IDX_*/POOL_* | C2/C3→命名常量(值+来源+日期三件套) | C4→Path.home() | C5→参数化(默认值也走配置)

⛔ 提交被拦下。这不是刁难 —— 上面每条都对应一次真实事故（见 skill silent-failure-defense）。
   确认无问题可: git commit --no-verify
[git_autocommit 失败] repos: /home/ubuntu/stock_workspace /home/ubuntu/.hermes/scripts